Difference between revisions of "Free Software Directory:Free software evaluation"

From Free Software Directory
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Parabola blacklisted software)
m (Parabola blacklisted software)
Line 41: Line 41:
==Parabola blacklisted software==
==Parabola blacklisted software==
===Current blacklisted software that is approved in the Directory===
===Blacklisted parabola software that is approved in the Directory===
* [[Abiword]]
* [[Abiword]]

Revision as of 15:53, 15 February 2018

This page is used to evaluate if suspected software is nonfree so we can remove them from the Directory or avoid to add them.

Software should be considered non-free until proven otherwise - the burdon of proof should be on the developers to prove their code is 100% freely distributable.

Chromium-based browsers[1]


  • Discourse itself. The current page revision is old and the evaluation needs to take into account the JavaScript trap and LibreJS compatibility. Ssee Talk:Discourse page for instructions on how to contribute to ongoing evaluation.


Qt WebEngine[1][2]

  1. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/directory-discuss/2017-12/msg00008.html
  2. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2017-01/msg00001.html

Telegram (desktop client)

  • Has delayed availability of source files compared to the binary release. See the numbered items below for more information.
    • Investigate if, after a binary release, the software has a license notice available somewhere and a place telling how to contact the copyright holders for the complete corresponding source.
  • Free/libre software philosophy related issue: lacks federation with XMPP. See the whole parent thread of the references from the enumerated list below, and also the page on XMPP in LibrePlanet wiki.
  1. https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/private/android/2017-December/001049.html
  2. https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/private/android/2017-December/001075.html

youtube-dl based software

  • There is a small bit of the program that appears to download some DRM js and some other questionable js.
  • Even if we manage to have positive review in order to keep/list it in the directory, this doesn't change the fact that the network effect of people depending on, recommending or even giving their time to YouTube will keep happening. I think bill-auger and jxself also suggested people to help with vaeringjar's (a user in #peers IRC channel) project to make a Youtube downloader that periodically checks YouTube itself and mirrors legally shareable content (with correct license metadata) from YouTube to torrents and to Internet Archive. However Internet Archive also has some software freedom issues related to their JavaScript.
  1. http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2017-07/msg00000.html
  2. http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2017-09/msg00003.html

Parabola blacklisted software

Blacklisted parabola software that is approved in the Directory


[See https://git.parabola.nu/blacklist.git/tree/?h=development for more scripts]


readonly WIKI_BASE_URL=https://directory.fsf.org/wiki
readonly BLACKLIST_URL=https://git.parabola.nu/blacklist.git/plain
readonly BLACKLIST_FILE=blacklist.txt

[ ! -f ./$BLACKLIST_FILE ] && echo "download failed" && exit 1

readonly PACKAGES=$(grep '^\s*[^:#]*:.*' ./$BLACKLIST_FILE                           | \
                    sed 's/^\s*\([^:#]*\):.*/\1/ ; s/^./\U&/g ; s/-./\U&/g ; s/-/_/g')

for package in $PACKAGES
do status=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" $WIKI_BASE_URL/$package)
   if   [ "$status" == '200' ]
   then echo "$package entry exists"
   elif [ "$status" == '404' -o "$status" == '301' ]
   then echo "$package entry not found"
   else echo "$package unknown response"

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the page “GNU Free Documentation License”.

The copyright and license notices on this page only apply to the text on this page. Any software or copyright-licenses or other similar notices described in this text has its own copyright notice and license, which can usually be found in the distribution or license text itself.