I renamed https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:Antifeatures#Closed_documentation to https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:Antifeatures#Nonfree_documentation because we avoid the term "closed": https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.en.html#Closed
I updated the entries listed in https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory_talk:Antifeatures#Rationale_for_specific_project_inclusion by modifying "Closed documentation" to "Nonfree documentation" in their source. --David Hedlund (talk) 11:04, 16 January 2017 (EST)
Just update https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:Antifeatures and you should see all "Nonfree documentation" entries.
I reverted the name change of Gnuradio. However, I removed "Nonfree documentary" intentionally. gnuradio is a dubbed GNU package, so how can the documentation be nonfree? Richard Stallman found this disturbing so I take for granted that it is free. Can you prove that its not? --David Hedlund (talk) 12:16, 19 January 2017 (EST)
Can you please send the text that you added in https://directory.fsf.org/wiki?title=User_talk:David_Hedlund&oldid=41456 to directory-discuss@firstname.lastname@example.org so we can talk about it with the community? --David Hedlund (talk) 13:01, 19 January 2017 (EST)